Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

yeomans
 
 
Friday, 19th March 2010

Why couples should get out of my face

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 30 April 2009
LAUREN'S least favourite things about summer –
white linen trousers; sand in suncream; the sticky trail of Calippo juice running down one's arm and pooling in one's elbow crease; sweat (my own, other people's); entire days of television programming given over to sporting events; and couples.

Couples, if you hadn't noticed, are suddenly everywhere.

If you hadn't noticed, it will be because you're in a couple, and too busy nuzzling each other on the bus while I retch.

Couples, like hayfever and a new Big Brother series, are one of those unpleasant side-effects of summer that everyone forgets about each year until it quietly takes over the world.

It's panic-dating – the sun is out!

Quick, grab the nearest, vaguely eligible target with which to publicly canoodle.

The early birds will stake out claim on every park, grass verge and floral-mounted roundabout while the couple-come-latelies (the ones who had visa issues or previous marriages to wrap up before the frolicking could begin) will have to content themselves with tube platforms, supermarket checkouts, Starbucks queues or anywhere else inappropriate and far too near my face.

Obviously, it isn't love itself, in all its glorious and indefinable splendour, that I object to.

Love is fine.

Love is very nice, I'm sure.

I fully accept that while I still can't commit to a four-pack of tinned tomatoes ("what if I don't NEED four tins?

What if, two tins in, I suddenly start hating tinned tomatoes?"), other people can devote their whole lives to the mutual support and adoration of each other.

What I object to is when they're mutually supporting and adoring each other while they should be functioning as proper members of society.

Such as, and this may just be because I've never seen The Notebook and am therefore only half a woman, but why the incessant hand-holding?

There are 80 people charging down Tottenham Court Road towards you, can you not see the potential issues?

Is the plan really to snare unsuspecting single pedestrians into your web of pavement passion?

Because I'm telling you, the next couple whose conjoined arms I ricochet off like a shuttlecock will either break hands temporarily, or have them politely broken for good.

If I'm seeming a little more bitter than usual this week, it's because I am.

Not just because of the number of entwined couples I've had to step over in order to go about my business this week (seriously folks, what can you POSSIBLY find sexy about the Post Office? Is it the smell of dust, adhesive labels and despair?).

No, it's also because the plight of the singleton has taken an unprecedented knock-back over the last couple of weeks, in the matronly shape of Susan Boyle.

I know, I know, how dare I?

Because if we Brits love anything more than mocking life's unfortunates, it's pretending to love life's unfortunates as a compassionate cover for actually mocking them.

It's a cruel, cruel practice, and I believe it's only fair now that everyone who's declared Susan a "legend", "inspiration" or actually had the audacity to cry is now browbeaten* into buying every album she releases until Leona Lewis looks like a shoddy precursor.

That's what I think.

But while Susan herself is meekly doing her bit for the case of uncoupled women, it's the newspapers that have let the side down.

They've been using that heinous word – the word that should have been eradicated years ago, but somehow has lingered on like the ghost of antifeminism past: "Spinster". Uggggh.

How have we made it to the 21st century still using a word like spinster?

Men get "bachelor", with all its pleasant connotations of Cuppa-soup, while women get verbally locked away in attics to weave blankets and grow large facial warts.

Susan Boyle, thank you journalists, is not a spinster. She is a lady.

A lady who dreamed a dream. And, just maybe, that dream is to be able to get a latté or post a parcel without tripping over a snogging couple. Let's respect that.

*"Brow" being the operative word there, Susan's own pair providing subtle endorsement of the new Budget this week in their tribute to our own Chancellor of the Exchequer.


-------------------------------------
Click here for more Lauren Bravo.

Where are you? Add your pin to the Herald's international readers' map by clicking here.

Email the Herald: letters@worthingherald.co.uk

Want to read this page in French, German, Spanish, Polish, Portuguese, Urdu or 48 other languages? click here for Google translate.


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 30 April 2009 11:26 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Worthing
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.