Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 20th November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

No pictures – but what really happened in the town centre?



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 04 July 2008
I AM writing to seek your opinion and that of your readers on the latest initiative Worthing council has seen fit to unleash on the town.
That of a ban on the taking of photographs in public places.

Whilst shopping in Worthing on Saturday I witnessed a local tour being interupted by three uniformed town wardens informing the group that it was illegal to take photographs in public.

Needless to say the wardens' actions drew a lot of interest from everyone about, yet despite repeated requests they would not enter into discussion about the new law.

I feel that it is a very sad day when the council directs staff to enforce a law banning photography in public.

What were they thinking of?

This is a town that relies on tourism and it should be embracing visitors, not exercising draconian laws that give the impression that Worthing has become a minor police state.

Anthony Bradford
Worthing


Editor's note: There are two sides to this story. Town centre staff say a group of protesters (not tourists) were taking close-up pictures of the wardens in an intimidating way.
They were asked to stop and the police were called.

Click here to read the story and see links to the video.

NOTE: All letters must include a name and address which can be withheld by request.

-------------------------------------
Click here to go back to readers' letters.

Where are you? Add your pin to the Herald's international readers' map by clicking here.

Email the Herald: letters@worthingherald.co.uk




The full article contains 264 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 03 July 2008 4:38 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Worthing
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Steve Norton,

04/07/2008 15:58:47
Is that true?
No photography in public?
I really don't believe it. Hahahahaha.
Are they mad?
Where is Steve Stevens when you really need him.
2

_Lily,

Worthing 05/07/2008 12:19:36
I don't believe it is Worthing Borough Council enforcing this though, I don't believe it is anything to do with them.

It's the shopwatch scheme which WBC doesn't run.

If this is a direct result of WBC's actions I will be right behind in getting to the bottom of the matter. Photographers have rights! We're not terrorists, we're not jihadists, we're folks with hobbies that don't involve, drink, drugs and screaming after coming back from the pub at midnight.

That said I do think there was part of the video cut out where it appears the warden asked for his photo not to be taken but that was ignored by the photographer -- that would indeed be very bad on the chap taking the photo.

BUT, I will always stand up for the right for photographers to practice in a respectful manner. One thing I will say is these folks were photographing CCTV cameras 10 years on, was the fact a warden did say no to having his photo and then the attempt to remove said photo(s) played into the hands of making a scene which is what was wanted? I don't know, we don't know.

What's more, Worthing Borough Council actively promotes on their web homepage for people to take views of Worthing, and they put the best ones on the front page...That doesn't make sense if they're treating photographers like criminal terrorists.
3

Dave44,

Worthing 08/07/2008 11:51:29
I agree that people should be allowed to take photographs of whatever they like in a public place, but that is not the issue here. The people involved were not there to take photographs of Montaqgue Street, which lets face it is not a particularly interesting subject - they were there to antagonise the security guards. The security guard shown on the video was well within his rights to ask them to stop taking photos of him and his colleagues. You have to remember that the people involved aren't really interested in yours or my civil liberties, they are trying (badly) to be subversive when there really are more important things in the world to get upset about (Zimbabwe perhaps?).

4

,

08/07/2008 11:57:36
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
5

,

08/07/2008 11:58:34
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

,

08/07/2008 12:01:08
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.