Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 21st August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

ATHLETICS: East enders nick promotion from Worthing


Heroes' victory rewarded with agony

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 02 August 2008
HEARTBREAK followed hard on the heels of triumph for Worthing Harriers athletes when they won their match in a thrilling finish, only to find they had still been pipped for promotion in a tiebreak after their Southern League Men's Division 2 match.
Having led the match from the seven-event mark, they went into the final relay at Guildford on Saturday (August 2), the 19th event, level on points with their promotion rivals Luton. Their four runners pulled out everything in the drawer and thrashed
Luton in the decisive 4x400m, then minutes later got the unwanted news that east enders Victoria Park had won their home match at Mile End.

Victoria Park, by defeating division leaders Enfield & Haringey, plus their own local promotion rivals Ilford, ended level on points with Worthing. But their victory was so handsome it left no doubt that their superior team points over Harriers - accumulated by individual event success within their five matches - would take them from sixth to fourth and leave Worthing in sixth and outside the five promotion spots.

Ilford, who started the match in third place, ended up half a point behind Worthing (25 points) in the also-rans. Luton, half a point ahead of Worthing, therefore went up after all, in the last available place, behind champions Enfield & Haringey (28pts), runners-up Brighton & Hove (26), Hercules Wimbledon, who started the day in fifth place (26), and Victoria Park (25.5).

Mention needs making of the heroic Worthing 4x400m team, who knew the task before them and the consequence of defeat. They were up against a Luton team who had won both strings in the flat 100m and 400m and share the honours with Worthing in the 200m.

White hot running

In an adjacent lane to Luton, they steamed straight into an emphatic lead with 800m B string winner Tom Marsden's relish for winning from the front. Mark Burchett, first in the A 800m, second in the 1,500m, actually took the baton in second place to the Bexley runner but immediately stormed into a significant lead that 28-points-scoring all-rounder Craig Baker scorchingly maintained.

The job done and Luton struggling near the back, anchorman Michael Di Laura, earlier second in the 400m in 50.4sec, burnt a 50.1sec victory lap to the line. Bexley were second but disqualified for a handover out of bounds and so Luton, third, were promoted to second.

That closed Worthing's matchwinning margin to one point instead of two. Behind Luton's 140 points came Aldershot & Farnham with 102 points, Bexley with 92 and the Royal Navy with 54.

The other points-culling stand-out was runner and jumper Dean Storry with 19. He maintained his season's unbeaten high jump record with Dan Dunscombe, who also won the 110m hurdles B. Like Burchett, sprinter Andy Millen and thrower David Vandyke had a win and a second place. Lee Fulham contributed a short sprint double second.

More in the Herald this week. Watch out for pictures on this website.



The full article contains 509 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 August 2008 9:19 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Worthing
 
 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Do you think a 4.5 per cent above inflation water bill rise is too much?
Yes
No

Web Links:

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.