Why the cost?

Your letters
Your letters

Having read the article in the Herald, I am a little confused regarding the cost of £350,000 incurred in the MSK procurement process.

The 0.2 per cent of the whole budget is £350,000 taken from the NHS. Why did the procurement process (to date) cost £350,000 and if the process is to be re-started, how much will that cost the NHS service?

Surely the CCG are employees and therefore salaried and the procurement process is an obvious part of their remit as a commissioning group. The only other party who will have incurred costs are BUPA who, as a company tendering for a service contract, are not entitled to be reimbursed for any spending incurred by them in this process.

The possibilities to mind are:

1) Third parties were recruited to assist the CCG in their procurement process.

2) Additional costs were incurred by those who were actually involved in the process within the CCG and/NHS Foundation Trust.

3) Another cost factor of which we are not aware of.

Ellie Coyle

Western Row


• Want to share your views? Send your letters by email or post them to Letters, Worthing Herald, Cannon House, Chatsworth Road, Worthing, BN11 1NA. Remember to include your full name and address.